Rent vs Buy Calculator
Enter what you'd pay to buy and what you'd pay to rent, and see in which year owning pulls ahead — accounting for transaction costs and the investment return you give up.
On this page (4)
Inputs
The purchase price of the home you're considering.
The share of the price you pay in cash. The rest is financed.
Your annual interest rate. Use a quote you've actually been given, not an average.
How long the loan runs. The chart covers at least this many years.
What you'd pay each month to rent a comparable home.
How long you expect to live there before selling or moving.
Closing costs paid once at purchase: title, appraisal, transfer taxes, legal fees. Varies by state and county — check your own.
What comes off the top when you sell: agent commission, transfer taxes, legal fees.
Annual property tax as a share of the home's value. Rates differ by several times between jurisdictions.
Yearly upkeep, repairs, insurance, and HOA dues combined, as a share of the home's value.
Your assumption about how fast the home's value changes. Nobody knows this — try a range.
Your assumption about how fast rent rises at each renewal.
What the cash you don't tie up in a home would earn instead. This is the opportunity cost.
Result
- Buying Advantage After Your Stay
- $12,547.75
- Break-Even Year
- 9years
- Cash Needed Up Front
- $92,000.00
- Result
- Over this period, buying comes out ahead.
- Net Worth If You Buy
- $246,557.05
- Net Worth If You Rent
- $234,009.30
- Down Payment
- $80,000.00
- Buying Costs
- $12,000.00
- Loan Amount
- $320,000.00
- Monthly Principal & Interest
- $1,816.92
- Total Monthly Cost of Owning
- $2,485.24
- Total Paid While Owning
- $311,225.59
- Total Rent Paid
- $247,619.79
- Net Proceeds If You Sell
- $246,557.05
246,557 (buy) − 234,009 (rent) = 12,548 @ 10y; break-even @ 9y
Year-by-year breakdown
Aggregated by year. Figures are rounded, so yearly rows may differ slightly from the totals above.
| Year | Buying ($) | Renting ($) | Difference ($) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 75,711 | 105,121 | -29,410 |
| 2 | 92,007 | 118,484 | -26,478 |
| 3 | 108,912 | 132,090 | -23,179 |
| 4 | 126,451 | 145,938 | -19,487 |
| 5 | 144,650 | 160,026 | -15,376 |
| 6 | 163,538 | 174,354 | -10,817 |
| 7 | 183,141 | 188,919 | -5,778 |
| 8 | 203,491 | 203,719 | -227 |
| 9 | 224,619 | 218,750 | 5,869 |
| 10 | 246,557 | 234,009 | 12,548 |
How it works
FormulaFor each year: Buying net worth = home value × (1 − selling cost %) − remaining loan balance + accumulated portfolio. Renting net worth = accumulated portfolio, starting from the down payment plus buying costs. Each month, the cheaper path invests the difference between the two monthly costs. Break-even is the first year where buying ≥ renting.
The question "should I rent or buy?" is usually argued as though one answer is permanently right. It isn't. For almost any pair of a home and a comparable rental, buying starts out behind and ends up ahead — the only real question is where the crossover sits. That crossover is the break-even year, and it moves a great deal depending on transaction costs, how long you stay, and what you assume about prices, rents, and investment returns. This calculator finds it for your numbers instead of arguing about averages.
Why buying starts behind
Buying begins in a hole because of costs that happen only once. You pay closing costs when you buy, and you pay a commission and transfer costs again when you sell — neither of which builds any equity. On top of that, the money you put down is money you no longer have invested elsewhere. So the comparison here is not "mortgage payment versus rent," which is the comparison that makes buying look obviously better. It is a net-worth comparison: in each year, what would you be worth if you bought and sold that year, versus what would you be worth if you had rented and invested the difference?
How the comparison is kept fair
To keep that comparison honest, both paths are given the same money and the same monthly budget. The buyer puts the down payment and buying costs into the home and starts with no portfolio. The renter keeps that same cash and invests it. Each month, whichever path costs less puts the difference into its own portfolio, so no money is counted twice and neither side gets a free pass. At the end of each year, the buyer's net worth is the sale proceeds — the home's value minus selling costs minus the remaining loan — plus whatever portfolio has accumulated. The renter's net worth is simply the portfolio. Break-even is the first year the buyer's number reaches the renter's.
In the United States, the buying costs you enter cover what the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau lists as closing costs: appraisal fees, tax service fees, title insurance, government taxes, and prepaid items such as property taxes and homeowners insurance held in escrow until your first payment. The CFPB also notes that even where a seller pays some of these, buyers frequently absorb them indirectly through a higher price or a larger loan. Property tax is the other line that varies enormously — rates differ by several times between states and even between counties in the same state — which is why this calculator asks for it rather than assuming a national figure. Look up your own jurisdiction before trusting the result.
Ongoing ownership costs are charged here as a percentage of the home's current value rather than its purchase price. That matters over long horizons: a tax or maintenance budget frozen at what you paid in year one becomes unrealistically cheap by year twenty-five if the home appreciates at all. Maintenance, insurance, and any association dues are combined into a single yearly percentage so you can adjust one number rather than three. A newer condominium with high dues and a older detached house with high upkeep can end up at similar totals by very different routes.
The three numbers nobody can look up
Three of the inputs are not facts and cannot be looked up: home appreciation, rent growth, and investment return. They are assumptions about the future, and no source has the correct value for them. The productive way to use this calculator is not to find "the right" numbers but to change one at a time and watch where the answer flips. If buying wins under every appreciation rate you consider plausible, the decision is robust. If the answer flips between two rates you find equally believable, then the honest conclusion is that the financial case is a coin toss and you should decide on the things a calculator cannot price — how long you actually want to stay, how much you want the freedom to leave, and what a landlord can do to you at renewal.
Rent growth deserves more attention than it usually gets. The principal-and-interest portion of a fixed-rate mortgage never rises, while rent resets at every renewal. A gap that looks small in year one compounds into the single biggest driver of long-run break-even, which is why a market with fast-rising rents can favor buying even when prices look expensive. Property taxes and maintenance do rise with the home's value, so ownership is not truly fixed — but the largest single line in it is.
Why taxes are left out
This calculator deliberately leaves taxes out. Capital gains treatment on a sale, mortgage interest deductibility, taxes on rental income, and taxes on investment returns all differ so much between countries — and change often enough within them — that building them in would mean maintaining several tax codes and quietly producing wrong answers whenever one changed. The comparison here is therefore pre-tax on both sides, which keeps it symmetric but means a large tax preference in your jurisdiction can shift the break-even year. Treat the result as a planning estimate to bring to a mortgage broker or tax adviser, not as financial advice.
| If this goes up | Break-even year | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly rent | Earlier | Renting gets more expensive relative to owning |
| Rent growth | Earlier | The rent gap widens every renewal; the mortgage does not |
| Home appreciation | Earlier | Sale proceeds grow faster than the loan shrinks |
| Buying and selling costs | Later | A deeper one-time hole to climb out of |
| Property tax, maintenance | Later | Ownership costs more every month, forever |
| Investment return | Later | The cash the renter keeps invested works harder |
| Mortgage rate | Later | More of each payment is interest, which builds no equity |
Frequently asked questions
- How many years do I need to stay for buying to pay off?
- There is no universal number — that's exactly what the break-even year in the results is for. It depends most on your combined buying and selling costs, the gap between rent and ownership costs, and what you assume about appreciation and investment returns. Enter your own figures and read the year where the two curves cross in the chart.
- Why does the calculator say buying loses money in the first few years?
- Because buying and selling a home both cost money that never becomes equity. In year zero the buyer has already given up the buying costs and would give up the selling costs on the way out, while the renter still holds that cash. The chart starts with that gap visible on purpose — it is the hole that appreciation and rent savings have to fill before owning pulls ahead.
- What should I put for home appreciation?
- Nothing here can tell you, and any calculator that fills it in confidently is guessing. Treat it as a range rather than a number: run the comparison at a low rate, at a moderate one, and at zero, and see whether your answer changes. If it doesn't, the decision is robust. If it does, the financial case isn't the deciding factor.
- Does this include property taxes, maintenance, and insurance?
- Yes. Property tax has its own field, and maintenance, insurance, and association dues are entered together as one yearly percentage of the home's value. Both are charged against the home's current value rather than the original price, so they rise as the home does.
- Why does the renter's money grow in this comparison?
- Because a renter who doesn't put a down payment into a house still has that money, and leaving it out would rig the comparison. Both paths are given the same starting cash and the same monthly budget; whichever path spends less that month invests the difference at the return rate you enter. That opportunity cost is often the single most overlooked item in rent-versus-buy arguments.
- Does it account for income tax, capital gains, or mortgage interest deductions?
- No. Those rules differ by country and change frequently, so building them in would mean maintaining several tax codes and silently producing wrong answers whenever one changed. The comparison is pre-tax on both sides, which keeps it symmetric. If your jurisdiction gives a large tax break to either owning or investing, the real break-even year will shift from what's shown.
- What does "break-even year" actually mean here?
- It means: if you sold at the end of that year, you would walk away with at least as much as if you had rented and invested the difference over the same period. It is a comparison of net worth at a point in time, not a claim that ownership costs less month to month.
Sources
Related calculators
Share
Embed this calculator
Paste this code into your site to embed a live, working version of this calculator.
Last updated: 2026-08-22